Ban on women cycling is lifted…partly

The ban on women riding bicycles in Saudi Arabia has been lifted according to reports by Al Jazeera and daily newspaper al-Yawn.

Head of Saudi Arabia's Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, is quoted as saying that it's not the commission's "job to search or follow women who drive bikes", which is understandable because cycling is clearly more virtue than vice, but an unnamed official quoted in Al-Yawn was more forthright saying; women can now ride bicycles on the proviso that they wear a full-body abaya, be accompanied by a male relative, and stay within in parks and recreational areas.

Women are now permitted to cycle for recreational purposes only, not as a primary mode of transportation, although quite how this distinction is to be made is not made clear.

The Facebook page The Uprising of Women in the Arab World is following developments and has posted this artworks by Mohammad Sharaf, an illustration that resonates in this poem below from an 1895 edition of Pleasure Cycling.

In older times the woman rode as fitted one of subject mind:
Her lord and master sat before, she, on a pillion, sat behind.
But now upon her flying wheel she holds her independent way
And when she rides a race with man, ’tis even chance she wins the day.

Bans on women cycling

In 2013 millions of women are prevented in law from using bicycles. The late Kim Jong Il made it illegal for women to ride bicycles in North Korea after the daughter of one of his generals was killed riding a bike. The current leader, Kim Jung Un, had the sense to recind the law last year but appears to have reinstated it according to the newspaper, Daily NK, Not only have women been stopped from riding their own bicycles, they are now prevented them from travelling as passengers.

The nonsensical ban is all the more onerous because bicycles in North Korea are vital for the majority of people who do not own cars or motorcycles.

{{cta-cycling}}

Cycle insurance for all

Every cycle insurance policy from the ETA includes new-for-old replacement if your bike is stolen, cover for accidental damage (race events included), third party insurance (in the case of an accident you may need to seek compensation or even deal with a claim by someone else), personal accident cover and if you breakdown, we will even come out and recover you and your bike. From 40p per week.

Bicycle bans and Britain

120 years ago bicycles were much more expensive to buy than they are now, but it was social stigma and expectation that women wear clothing that was completely ill suited to cycling that prevented women from taking to two wheels.

The women’s rights advocate Susan B. Anthony may have said that the bicycle did “more to emancipate women than anything else in the world”, but the road along which it travelled was a bumpy one.

On 21st June 1895, the Newark Sunday Advocate ran the following article, which reflects as much the stifling atmosphere of the cycling club as it does the social stigma directed at women who chose to wear the rational clothing that would allow them to use a bicycle in comfort:

The Unique Cycling club of Chicago is all that its name implies. One of its laws is that on all runs bloomers and knickerbockers shall be worn, and two members who disobeyed this rule recently met with a punishment that they will not forget soon. Union park was the rendezvous for the last run, and 50 members turned out. The president, Miss Bunker, observed two women wearing short skirts over their bloomers.

“Take the skirts off,” ordered Captain Bunker.

“Indeed we won’t,” was the reply.

A crowd of 200 had collected to see the start. The president and the captain held a consultation, and then, taking several strong armed members with them, fell on the skirt wearers and stripped them down to their bloomers.

“It was done in all seriousness,” said Mrs. Langdon. “The club’s rules are made to be kept and not to be broken. Why did we take off the skirts in public? For no other reason but to make examples of the offenders. They publicly defied our rules and were published accordingly.”

Rules for women cyclists in 1895

‘Rational dress’ for cyclists

When Annie Londonderry embarked on a circumnavigation of the globe in 1896 (to settle a bet that a woman could not cycle around the world), she soon discarded the corset and heavy skirts considered acceptable sportswear at the time in favour the more liberating athletic bloomers pictured right.

The rational dress society statement of purpose reads in part: The Rational Dress society protests against the introduction of any fashion in dress that either deforms the figure, impedes the movement of the body, or in any way tends to injure the health. It protests against the wearing of tightly-fitted corsets, of high-heeled or narrow toed boots and shoes; of heavily-weighted skirts, as rendering healthy exercise almost impossible.